Seven in eight Americans say they would turn down any amount of money up to $1 million to kick a dog in the head.
However, half of Americans say they could be motivated to throw a rotten tomato at a politician they dislike.
From attitudes toward puppies to politicos, a major new study now available on the Association of Religion Data Archives offers insights into how Americans apply ethical principles in the moral choices they make in their everyday lives.
Most of us like to think of ourselves as merciful, kind, generous human beings, according to the online survey of 1,519 people conducted as part of the Measuring Morality project based at The Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University.
Three-quarters of respondents said nurturing others gives them a warm feeling inside; 77 percent at least somewhat agreed with the statement, “I am a very compassionate person.”
So, only two in five respondents disagreed with the statement, “Regardless of concerns about principles, in today’s world you have to be practical, adapt to opportunities, and do what is most advantageous for you.”
The comprehensive survey included a series of questions asking whether increasing amounts of money up to $1 million would motivate individuals to commit certain acts. The questions, written by Jesse Graham, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Southern California, offer a glimpse into the depths and practical nature of the moral standards of Americans. In each scenario, respondents were told both that nothing bad would happen to them afterward and that they could not use the money to make up for their actions.
Consider these findings:
• Dirty politics: Nearly six in 10 respondents said it is essential that political leaders promote empathy toward each other. Yet 13 percent of Americans said they would throw a rotten tomato at a political leader they disliked for free; another one in five said they would do it for $10,000 or less. Six percent said they would do it for $100,000. For another 10 percent, $1 million or more was their bottom line to toss the tomato. In a related finding, nearly one in five respondents said for the right price they would throw out a box of election ballots to help their candidate win.
The online survey conducted in March 2012 represents the first phase of the comprehensive Measuring Morality project supported by The John Templeton Foundation. Sociologist Stephen Vaisey of Duke University is the director of the project, working with collaborators from several universities.
Vaisey said researchers are still in the early stages of analyzing the project data, but initial indications raise some concerns about the prospects for a more civil society.
There are real differences on questions of morality, he said, and the “tribal, two-party political system” in the United States makes it likely the nation will continue to experience a lot of tension in achieving public consensus on moral issues.
What does make him optimistic is that efforts such as the Measuring Morality project will help define what the moral divisions in the United States are, and the complex sources of those differences.
That type of understanding, he said, is the precursor to building “mutual respect and civility.”
And that is something the great majority of Americans say they want.
With the likely exception, of course, of the 1 percent of survey participants who said they would kick a dog in the head for free.
Leave a Reply
Search Ahead of the Trend
Please type your search term:
Most Recent Columns
Primers & Tutorials
The following primers and interactive tutorials were developed by theARDA.com and the International Center for Journalists (http://www.icfj.org/).
Connect with the ARDA
Our Most Popular Tags
Click on your desired tag, to view the available columns.
Baylor Religion Survey
religion and economics
religion and health
religion and politics
U.S. Congregational Life Survey
worship abortion (2)
US Congregational Membership Reports
Explore congregational membership in every county, state, and urban area in the United States. Based on the Religious Congregations and Membership Study collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies this is the most complete census available on religious congregations and their members.
ARDA's National Profiles provide detailed data by country on religious adherents, religious freedom, demographics and a host of other social measures. Choose a country below to see its profile:
Our American Denominations feature provides detailed information and family trees for over 400 U.S. religious denominations.
Use QuickStats to browse dozens of topics and see reponses from major national surveys, demographic patterns, and changes over time! Available topics:
Use QuickLists to see rank-ordered data on religion in the U.S. and around the world. See our most popular topics: